![]() ![]() Yes, this does mean by having the three tabs open of webmail, Facebook and Netflix that Waterfox will explode up to half-a-gig of memory use just by sitting there just like Firefox does. The way the engine works just explodes in memory use by nature. That’s not fixed, and that’s not Waterfox’s fault at all. This is Firefox we’re talking aboutīeing that Waterfox is Firefox in 64-bit flavor, it still has the exact same memory-munching problem Firefox does. Startup and shutdown would show no major difference in speed. Document load time – especially over a network – would only be slightly faster on 64-bit (meaning you really wouldn’t notice any significant difference). Think of it this way: Would you notice a difference between a 32-bit Microsoft Word and a 64-bit Microsoft Word? Nope. You can benchmark-benchmark-benchmark all day long and spout out numbers-numbers-numbers, but the fact of the matter is that in practical use, you will notice little to no difference in performance compared to a 32-bit browser. In a browser application, 64-bit at this point really hasn’t proven to be any better than the 32-bit flavors. Google Chrome causing you 100 Disk Usage? This may be a fix for you.Now if we’re talking about, say, a video editing suite that requires gobs and gobs of memory to crunch and render video data faster, then oh yes, 64-bit is better because that architecture can process and access everything quicker. How can we limit data usage on Windows 7 ? Solved! Which browser is better in performance and resource usage? If you suggest a more linear approach, you have a VERY simple lifestyle. ![]() Love/Hate Firefox look for something similar that doesn't die at 2 gByte. ![]() Want to cook special dinner for friend, need beef specials at local supermarkets. Need brake job on car look up reviews for repairs shops nearby. Oh, I forgot to mention ordinary work, simultaneously, at the same time. No 6 AM flights with a 7 hour layover!!!!!! Oh, bye the way, one is looking for lowest prices on each of these, as well as suitability. Many homes to rent, so another 20 or so in that tab. Multiple windows for flights (one from brother's airport one from mine multiplied by different airlines).Įach window contains multiple tabs (sites) Cars: Avis, Europcar, Budget, Hertz, etc., etc., etc.Īirlines: too many to mention at least 20 tabs for airline data. Two windows for away-from-home house rentals. If you think you can do that in a dozen or two tabs, well, you clearly have not done that (understatement of the millennium!). I recently coordinated a trip to Spain, my brother/wife and me/wife, where we each live in a different part of the USA and had to fly to Bilbao and arrive at roughly the same time, pick up the rental cars, drive 2 hours to meet the house rental owner, etc. To those thinking that a window or two, with a dozen tabs each is WAY more than anyone could want: Get a life not everyone follows your paradigm !!! Those of use who work on multiple or complex problems need a boatload of tabs, divided up by windows (per topic). The issue is expecting reasonable response when opening a large number of /windows/tabs/. My kernel sits at a a steady 1.2G though. Your case may be isolated but 3G seems excessive. Waterfox uses about 1GB RAM on my MBP whilst FF uses less than half (400GB). Switching to Chrome as it desn't seem to suffer from the memory leak and bog not only it's self down but the rest of the PC." No matter the number of tabs open it crawls up to 3 gigs+ useage in about an hour of being open and needs to be restarted, even though the total RAM useage of each tab doesn't add up to a reaction of that. Please do more research before writing a review it's arguments like these that create unnecessary noise in the internet. I'm typing this on waterfox and I find it a very fast and solid browser. Waterfox is a veteran in the browser wars now, with years in development. Waterfox is a serious project from honest, hardworking people and you're doing a disservice to those who are trying to find informed reviews. Why are people so opinionated on things they know so little about? I find your opinion biased and inaccurate. I don't know for sure because I've never used it, but you can read online reviews and see. My point was Waterfox could contain some kind of malware or viruses which is WHY it's not used. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |